Playground Liability: Accident or Injury

Duty of Care The
law requires the school to exercise the same standard of care toward
its students as would a reasonably prudent parent under comparable circumstances.
Further, in providing the highest duty of care to a student schools
must exercise due care to prevent unreasonable risk of harm to the child
from playground equipment and other playground site hazards.
By Dr. Melinda Bossenmeyer, Ed.D
On average, 17 children die each year playing on playgrounds.
Many deaths and injuries could be prevented if playgrounds - from equipment
to surfacing to layout - were designed with safety in mind. When a student
is hurt on a school playground, first and foremost, school staff should
offer first aid and typically notify parents of the injury if further treatment
is needed.
The vast majority of playground injuries are minor and do not require
further follow-up. However, it is estimated that 10% of injuries sustained
in elementary schools result in a “major” injury requiring follow-up care.
In these cases, parents are notified and advised that they should seek further
medical care for their child.
Seventy percent of all school injuries occur during recess or physical
education. A review of injury data has revealed that the lack of proper
supervision is considered a “contributing factor in playground injuries
over 40% of the time”.
This article will focus on supervision, “duty of care” and and one court’s
ruling related to supervision, as an illustration of supervision issues.
The notion of “accident”, which is described as "instantaneous”, is examined.
Injuries on the other hand are often found to be preventable through established
rules and “active” supervision, the kind of supervision which is proactive
to intervene in dangerous play.
Some states have adopted the
Consumer
Product Safety Commission’s Playground Safety Guidelines
which generally focus on a three pronged “standard of care”:
- Supervisors must provide the highest duty of care to prevent
unreasonable risk of injury.
- The playground design allows for gradual challenges and skill development.
- The playground is properly installed with adequate space to prevent
overcrowding and ensure safe play.
Proactive Supervision is Important in Reducing Potential Liability
Failure to Witness Injury
A common refrain in lawsuits is that the supervisor’s failure to observe
a child at the time of injury constitutes a negligent act and therefore
the supervision is inadequate. However, failure to observe a student at
the exact time of the injury does not always constitute negligence. Observing
a particular student throughout the complete course of recess is not practical,
especially in light of the number of students a supervisor may be assigned
to observe.
Reasonable care does not require constant and undeviating scrutiny of
a particular child on a supervised playground. Accordingly, a playground
supervisor is not necessarily negligent if he or she fails to observe a
particular child at the precise moment an injury occurs during normal play
or informal sport activities. Rather, if a student’s behavior was neither
dangerous nor unusual, then the supervisor would not be expected to pay
close attention to a particular child.
Case Review
In
the case of Norman v. Turkey Run Community School Corp., 411 N.E.2d 614
(Ind. 1980), plaintiff, age 7, was running and bumped heads in a collision
with a 6-year-old during morning recess. There was no oral or written directive
to defendant's teachers to prohibit children from running on the playground
during a supervised recess.
On that particular day, seven or eight teachers were supervising the
recess which was more than the number of supervisors required for the 188
children on the schoolyard.
At the time of the incident, two teachers who were standing in close
proximity to the site of the injury, looked up but were unable to warn plaintiff.
The trial court, therefore, found in favor of defendant School because the
collision was "instantaneous."
Appeals Court decision
The appeals court, however, held that there was sufficient evidence to
infer that defendant's teachers were inattentive and had failed to observe
a dangerous situation, or had failed to warn after observing a dangerous
situation. The defendant School appealed to the state supreme court.
State Supreme Court Overturns Decision
In
general, the State Supreme Court noted that persons entrusted with children,
"whose characteristics make it likely that they may do somewhat unreasonable
things," have a legal duty to supervise their charges. Further, the court
acknowledged that school authorities have a legal duty to exercise reasonable
care and supervision for the safety of the children under their control.
As characterized by the State Supreme Court, supervised recess periods
are generally accepted as a normal school procedure for elementary school
children. Moreover, the court found running and playing tag are normal recess
activities for young children. Under such circumstances, the court doubted
that there was any unreasonable risk of injury involved, so long as there
are no unusual conditions present.
In this particular instance, the State Supreme Court found "no indication
that there was any event, dangerous condition, dangerous instrumentality
or special knowledge of students having a troublesome or mischievous nature
being on the playground area known to the supervising teachers at the recess."
On the contrary, the court found “the only possible ‘dangerous situation
developing' was the fact that students were running on the playground at
recess." Accordingly, the State Supreme Court reiterated its determination
that running at school generally does not pose an unreasonable risk of injury.
In the above stated case, the State Supreme Court vacated the decision
of the appeals court and affirmed the judgment of the trial court entering
summary judgment in favor of the defendant School.
This case points out the importance of establishing rules for proactive
supervision, safe play and intervening to stop or prevent unsafe play. This
was more than likely a major ordeal for the School as well as the parents
and children involved.
The ambiguity in the requirements around duty of care in supervision
illustrates certain issues about keeping children safe on the playground.
Diligent and proactive supervision on the part of the playground supervisors
may not always prevent every injury from happening, but it likely will contribute
to reducing the numbers of injuries and also reduce potential liability.
Free Monthly Newsletter!
The monthly Play Nice! Newsletter is full of tips and techniques for
managing a Peaceful Playground. Each month subscribers receive links to valuable
resources for free playground grants and updated product information on the
award winning playground safety program from Dr. Melinda Bossenmeyer. Add
your email address today!
|